Originally published in Carroll Capital, the print publication of the Carroll School of Management at Boston College. .
With critics on all sides and regulators breathing down on them, companies looking to do the right thing are still pushing ahead on social and environmental issues. But they鈥檙e doing it a little more quietly.
That鈥檚 according to a newly released report by the In the biannual survey, nine out of 10 executives reported that during the previous two years, leaders in their company had taken a stand on ESG (environmental, social, and governance) concerns鈥攁 robust 54 percent increase since 2020. 蝌蚪直播 850 senior-level executives participated in the survey.
Katherine Smith
At the same time, these leaders are turning down the volume. 鈥淪ome are stepping back from the marquee, but they鈥檙e not stepping back from social and environmental investments,鈥� says Katherine Smith, executive director of the center, which is the largest organization of its kind with 500 corporate members that bring almost 10,000 employees to its programs each year. Quieter steps range from improving gender-equity policies to reducing plastic waste, moves that also align with business goals like employee retention and cost saving.
Companies are also shifting their public advocacy. The center鈥檚 鈥淪tate of Corporate Citizenship鈥� survey shows that in 2022, corporate leaders were voicing a clear stand听on gender and racial equity and inclusion. That remains a central priority for the companies, but now their public statements are more likely to highlight issues like sustainability and climate change, which are viewed as less controversial. Still, because ESG in general has become a political hot potato, that, too, is a softer message.
These changes reflect the intense pressure companies are under from various quarters, according to Smith. Corporations are facing the competing demands of employees, activists, and politicians of all political stripes. 鈥淚t鈥檚 a sea shift in the ESG space, and we鈥檙e experiencing the storm of that shift right now,鈥� Smith says.
“There's a lot of frustration about the continued fragmentation of reporting standards. Right now, it's the wild, wild West in terms of how companies are addressing these issues.”
On the regulatory side, new rules in the European Union are taking effect, and US companies are not prepared, Smith says. While US laws focus mainly on greenhouse gases and carbon emissions, the EU鈥檚 Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive is more sweeping. It calls for a clear and comprehensive picture of what companies are doing on social and environmental issues.
American firms doing business in Europe, including many members of Smith鈥檚 organization, will be expected to comply. Some are scrambling to understand the requirements鈥攂ut others are looking away. That鈥檚 partly because the regulations are complicated, with a raft of standards, each with its own requirements. 鈥淪o there鈥檚 a lot of frustration about the continued fragmentation of reporting standards鈥� in both the EU and US, Smith says. 鈥淩ight now it鈥檚 the wild, wild West in terms of how companies are addressing these issues.鈥�
